|
Mayor's Row...by Ned Mitchell
Most of the time it takes me a
while to get it. There are so many behind the scenes details to try and figure
out when writing a weekly column. Quite often after I have written a column and
it is published a few days later, I get it! One can easily see what is happening
when it happens yet to figure out why that event happened, takes a lot of time
and thought. Since I no longer mow the grass due to the weather I am often at a
loss for detailed thought.
I think I have finally figured out the recent
pay increase that legislators gave themselves. I found it strange that they
would vote to raise the minimum wage so eagerly the first day in session.
Legislators immediately took up the raise in minimum wage and passed it with
little debate. Most legislators eagerly voted for raising the minimum wage. I
was in agreement with that legislation. While the argument can be made that this
is a federal issue and should be decided by Congress it was clear to me that
while the Republicans controlled Congress this was not going to happen. Congress
has had 8 years of Republican control or more to do something about the minimum
wage but has steadfastly refused to do so. It is a classic case of finger
pointing with Republicans in Washington saying it should be a state issue and
Republicans at the state level saying it should be a federal issue. Baloney, it
needed to be done and Democrats in Illinois are to be commended for taking the
bull by the horns so to speak and assuming a leadership role in this
legislation.
No sooner did Democrats take care of the minimum wage issue
they tackled the difficult idea of pay raises for themselves. I mean, after all,
they took care of the lowest paid people, so why not take a little for
themselves? I gave careful thought to that and even admitted that I thought they
deserved a pay raise since they had not had one in 10 years. Is that
coincidental with the utility companies also going for a period of ten years
without an increase in rates? Here we have legislators going 10 years with no
pay raise and also AmerenCips with no rate increase. I did disagree with how
legislators set up the pay raise issue and waited until after the election to
pass it.
What started out a very confusing vote, a legislator had to
vote yes if they were against a pay raise and vote no if they were for a pay
raise, ended up passing with mainly Democrats supporting the legislation. Then
things got more confusing. Democrats put forth a bill calling for a 10 percent
pay raise but they did not appropriate any money to pay for the pay raises.
Along comes Democrat State Comptroller Dan Hynes with the concept that unless
legislators amend the appropriation bill he will not pay the additional money to
legislators. Hynes has got to be about as popular as,well, that punch bowl thing
and what is in it. Senate Democrats moaned and groaned about how they must have
additional money. Most of those Democrats who moaned and groaned are not in the
category of folks that most of us think need more money. The farther north ones
goes, the more you will see this legislator job is a part time position. Our
local legislators treat this as a full time job and they do work hard at it,
both Democrats and Republicans. But when you get up north you will find that
most legislators have other jobs and often treat this job as being a part time
gig. Most folks don't feel sorry for politicians anyhow so that argument fell on
deaf ears.
Now when the smoke has cleared we find that legislators were
less than truthful with us. No kidding! Initially they said this would be a 10
percent pay raise. Now we find out that it is actually a 15.6 percent pay raise.
Wait, it gets even better, it is retroactive meaning that legislators will get a
rather large one time check for back pay. There are two things that can prevent
this from happening. The House of Representatives has not acted on the
appropriation bill providing the extra money and then the Governor does have
veto power and he could stop it from becoming law. Folks lets not get greedy
here. I think legislators are entitled to be paid fairly but I do not think they
are entitled to over 15 per cent in a pay raise and I for sure do not think they
should receive back pay.
There were mainly three issues the legislators
were going to take up during the veto session. They were raising the minimum
wage, increasing their own salaries, and doing something with the proposed
utility rate increases.
Remember during the last election when
politicians were running all over this state talking about minimum wage and how
they were really going to bat for poor folks? Remember when they literally ran
up and down the state county by county beating the utility providers over the
head and promising to extend the rate increase by another 3 years? Of course we
did not hear them bleating about raising their own pay, but there are only so
many hours in a day so I am sure that was an oversight.
Legislators got
the minimum wage increased and then upped their own pay but they just could not
get up enough muster to handle the utility issue. In the mean time Illinois
utility companies spent 15 million, yes that is million, dollars to advertise
the fact that power rates are too low in this state. Utility companies have also
put millions, yes I said millions, of dollars in politician's pockets,
particularly in the State Senate and guess where utility rate freeze issues are
bottled up? If you guessed the State Senate, you are so right.
I've just
got one simple question for legislators. If you vote to give a raise in pay to
those on the minimum wage how is it fair to let utility companies come along and
take that increase and then more away from those who need it most? I mean if we
are trying to protect those who need it most should we also not make sure
utility bills are affordable? Many of us will grumble about our light bills
going from $200 per month to $320 but we will be able to pay it. If a person who
is working for minimum wage gets an extra .50 per hour in pay but their utility
bill goes up $120 a month, how have they gained anything? Don't hold your breath
waiting on the state to make this an issue. There is a tax being paid by the
consumer to the state that is based on your bill. The higher the bill, the more
tax they collect.
The last comment I'll make today though is this. If
the State of Illinois is leading the nation in debts owed and if we cannot pay
for basic services and our pension fund is billions of dollars in debt, how
could legislators find the money to increase their own pay? It appears to me
that we need to build some huge indoor arenas with lots of grass to mow so
legislators can get behind that Sears push mower and do some thinking!
Congratulations to Sesser resident Randall Crocker and West Frankfort resident
Danny Melvin who were chosen Monday evening by fellow county board members to
serve as Chairman and Vice-chairman of the Franklin County board. I think we
will see some changes for the better in how our county government functions.
If you want to see Oprah when she comes to Sesser you had better get that bumper
sticker on your vehicle. As you know by now we are making an effort to get the
famous talk show hostess Oprah to do a show at the historic Sesser Opera House.
Our seating is limited to about 400 people and we have 500 bumper stickers.
Admission to the event will be based on first come first serve but you must have
proof that you put a bumper sticker on your vehicle before you can be
considered. They are available at the City Hall, The Print Shop or the Opera
House Café.
You are invited to a 40th birthday celebration for Mark
Eubanks, son of Garry & Barb Eubanks of the White Oak community north of Sesser.
The party will be from 2 until 5 p.m. at the First Baptist Church in Sesser this
Sunday, December 10th. No gifts please! Cake and punch will be served.
If
you need us give us a call at 625-5322 or 625-3611 or write
nedmitchell@verizon.net or www.sesser.org or P. O. Box 277, Sesser, IL 62884.
|